Poster Presentation

©Genève Tourisme, Loris von Siebenthal

Search Abstracts | Symposia | Slide Sessions | Poster Sessions

Traces in the Brain: Neural Evidence for Syntactic Movement in English and Chinese

Poster C106 in Poster Session C, Thursday, October 1, 10:45 am - 12:45 pm, Wangari Maathai and Lise Girardin

Yuhan Huang1, Zhengwu Ma1, Yuqi Jin1, Beth Chan2, Zheng Shen2, Jackie Yan-Ki Lai1, John T. Hale3, Jixing Li1; 1City University of Hong Kong, 2National University of Singapore, 3Johns Hopkins University

Introduction. Syntactic movement is a central concept in generative linguistics for explaining non-canonical word order and long-distance dependencies. In movement-based accounts, surface word order is derived from deeper structural representations through displacement operations, which leave traces at the original base positions. Such representations have played a key role in formal analyses of passives, wh-dependencies, and related constructions, yet their psychological and neurobiological reality remains debated. Alternative accounts explain processing difficulty in terms of surface dependency relations, memory demands, or usage-based constraints, without appealing to transformations or multiple levels of syntactic representation. This question is especially important from a cross-linguistic perspective, because English relies more heavily on overt displacement, whereas in Chinese many dependencies are realized in situ or mediated by discourse-pragmatic mechanisms. Here, we test the neural reality of syntactic movement in English and Chinese during naturalistic listening, using syntactic node counts, trace-based regressors, and word embeddings derived from X-bar–style tree annotations. Methods. We analyzed the English and Chinese subsets of a publicly available naturalistic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset (Li et al., 2022). The dataset included 49 native English speakers (30 females; mean age = 21.3 ± 3.6 years) and 35 native Chinese speakers (15 females; mean age = 19.3 ± 1.6 years), who listened to audiobook versions of The Little Prince in their native languages. We manually annotated all sentences in the English (N = 1,502) and Chinese (N = 1,577) stimuli with X-bar–style syntactic trees. From these annotations, we derived top-down and bottom-up syntactic node counts, as well as a binary trace regressor. As a comparison, we also generated Penn Treebank–style context-free grammar (CFG) trees for all sentences and computed corresponding node-count measures. We aligned these syntactic predictors with fMRI responses using vertex-wise general linear models. In parallel, we extracted deep- and surface-structure word embeddings from each layer of LLaMA 3.1 8B. Deep structure was operationalized as a reordering of the same lexical items according to X-bar dependency relations, whereas surface structure preserved the original word order. We used banded ridge regression to model neural responses from the selected deep- and surface-structure embeddings, together with a combined embedding defined as their average. At the group level, statistical significance was assessed separately for English and Chinese using one-sample, one-tailed t-tests with a cluster-based permutation procedure. Results. GLM analyses showed that traces and all syntactic node-count measures significantly predicted activity in canonical language regions in both languages, with effects centered in the left temporal cortex. In English, trace effects and the contrast favoring X-bar over CFG top-down node counts additionally recruited left frontal regions. In the model-based encoding analysis, combined embeddings outperformed either deep- or surface-order embeddings alone in English, suggesting that neural responses were best explained by representations integrating both underlying dependency structure and surface word order. In Chinese, however, surface-order embeddings outperformed both deep-order and combined embeddings, suggesting that neural responses were more strongly driven by overt sequential structure than by reordered dependency-based representations.

Topic Areas: Syntax and Combinatorial Semantics, Computational Approaches

SNL Account Login


Forgot Password?
Create an Account

News

2026 Membership is Open.

Meeting Registration is Closed.

Symposium Submissions are Closed.

Abstract Submissions are Closed.

Board of Directors Election is Closed.

See Dates & Deadlines for other important dates.